The Writing Style Of The Term- Harold And Maude By Colin...

Best Book of the Term- Harold Maude Have you ever read a book that has changed your life? A book that leaves you feeling motivated and enlightened. â€Å"Harold and Maude† by Colin Higgins does just that. This book is not simply a quirky love story between two unlikely individuals, but about the power of optimism and a unique way of living life, a true inspiration. However, besides the storyline, the writing style of the author has a huge impact in setting the book apart. When considering why the book â€Å"Harold and Maude† is the best book of the term the fundamentals of the writing style have to be taken into account from the points of view to the ending which, all play a crucial role in making the reading experience memorable. First is the use of the third-person omniscient point of view. According to the text, in the third-person omniscient point of view, â€Å"a narrator from â€Å"outside† the story world tells the story.† (WEAL, 45) The advantage of this style is the reader gets a u nique perspective of getting to hear the characters thoughts. For example, â€Å"†¦she listened to the Chopin playing softly. How soothing, she thought†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Higgins, 2) Here the reader can comprehend the character’s, state of mind as she enjoys the music playing in the background. Unlike in the book â€Å"World War Z† by Max Brooks where the author has used the epistolary style using the first-person point of view that, â€Å"reveals action through letters.† (WEAL, 46) The disadvantage of this writing style is the reader

Civil Unions and Same Sex Couples free essay sample

Another benefit that is denied to same-sex couples is the right to Social Security benefits upon the death of a spouse. Traditionally, the Social Security benefits go to the surviving spouse, but in same-sex unions, the benefits simply stop. Similar to Social Security benefits are employee benefits, which are provided to the partners of traditional unions, but denied to same-sex couples. In 2009, the federal government presented an act to the floor of Congress that would provide employee benefits to the spouses of same-sex unions employed by the government. Another point of contention is the right to adoption, a right that is denied to same-sex couples. The stability of same-sex relationships has also been called into question by opponents. One benefit that is often overlooked due to the fact that it does not pertain to same-sex couples is the benefit to the economy of same-sex unions through the accumulation of disposable income. Civil Unions in Arizona for Same Sex Couples Many people are confused on the differences between a civil union and marriage. The difference is the involvement of religion. Marriage is the traditional school of thought, where a man and a woman go through a ceremony in a church or other religious structure, where the ceremony is conducted by an ordained representative of the religion in question. Involved in the ceremony is the completion and signing of a marriage certificate, an official government document that goes on record with the state that allows for the distribution of any and all legal benefits as spelled out by law and tradition. A civil union, however, is devoid of the religious connotations f marriage, meaning no religious ceremony, no religious representative, and no church. Civil unions are conducted in a court room or other non-religious location by judge, or more commonly, a Justice of the Peace. During the non-religious ceremony of a civil union, a marriage certificate is completed by the couple. Most religious institutions deny a marriage ceremony to same-sex couples, and the majority of laws do not make allowances for same-sex couple to have a civil union. The focus of this paper is on civil unions for same-sex couples and what this entails. Several other states have chosen to go the route of civil unions for same sex couples over marriage. There are numerous reasons that this is necessary. One of the biggest arguments of people against same sex marriage is that it tries to redefine what marriage is. By giving same sex couples the title of civil union, it neutralizes this argument while giving the exact same benefits. Civil unions can also be viewed as a stepping stone towards marriage. By legally recognizing the relationship, it opens the door for acceptance in the general population (Sadler, 2008). Another argument is that same sex couples cannot provide the same kind of stable relationship that can come from traditional marriages. One state that has been able to provide ample information about the results of civil unions is Vermont. In 2000, civil unions were legally recognized under Vermont state law (Elder, Rothblum, amp; Solomon, 2010). This gave way to the ability to conduct studies on the effect of same sex couples being able to union. By following several gay and lesbian couples that undertook these unions, we can see that over several years few differences arose. One study followed dozens of both male and female same-sex couples that received civil unions shortly after the law went into effect in Vermont. These couples were then compared to a number of same-sex couples not in civil unions and a number of heterosexual married couples. The test was taken three years after the beginning of the Vermont state law and discovered many surprising findings. One shocking result refuted a long held stereotype that gay men are only capable of flings, or short relationships. The result of these tests showed that gay men in longer relationships were less likely to have separated at the 3 year mark than women in this situation. Another shocking result of this study was that same-sex couples where not only capable of maintaining monogamous relationships, they can even report higher relationship quality. â€Å"Compared with heterosexual married participants, both types of same-sex couples reported greater relationship quality, compatibility, and intimacy and lower levels of conflict. Longitudinal predictors of relationship quality at Time 2 included less conflict, greater level of outness, and a shorter relationship length for men in same-sex relationships and included less conflict and more frequent sex for women in same-sex relationships at Time 1† (Balsam, beauchaine, rothblum, amp; Solomon, 2008). What needs to happen for civil unions is a change in the understanding of what it means to be married. What was done to the word queer, to make it represent relationships based on love, rather than orientation, needs to be applied to the term civil union. Many in the â€Å"queer community† see a fundamental flaw with what marriage is. They believe it portrays feelings of ownership and possession over one’s partner. Many believe that gay marriage is only accepted because it changes what gay people are. It assumes that they are ready to conform and be a â€Å"normal† couple. The article â€Å"Queer Kids of Queer Parents Against Gay Marriage! † proposes that this idea of gay marriage exists only to put scared conservatives at ease. The kids in this article argue that marriage was created as a goal for gay couples to get them to settle down. Once married, these couples will buy houses and try to raise children and conform to what is considered proper behavior. (queerkidssaynomarriage, 2009) Civil unions could be a new kind of marriage that provides the same legal benefits but is something more meaningful all together. One such version of this idea comes from â€Å"The Case for Civil Unions for All Couples. † This article by Alan Dershowitz, proposes that civil unions be required for all couples. Whether or not a person is a same sex couple they would register for a civil union with your state and accept the â€Å"rights and responsibilities† associated. Marriage would still exist, but only as an option for those inclined. This would separate the religious institution of marriage from the state recognition of being a couple. Marriage would remain a sacrament as ordained by the Bible and couples that felt marriage was unnecessary would not be pressured into the title (Dershowitz, 2010). Same sex couples are able to raise children just as well as heterosexual couples. Children in foster homes looking to get adopted into a family simply want to live a normal life. Adopting them can transform their lives around. Not allowing same-sex couples to adopt children is a mistake. Adoption homes are already overcrowded and not allowing someone who wants to raise an individual that opportunity is just wrong. Only four states allow same-sex couples to adopt children. These states are Vermont, New Jersey, Massachusetts and California. Yet, because it is illegal to marry a lot of couples have a very hard time adopting children. (Belge, 2010). â€Å"Scientific studies have shown that children who grow up in one or two-parent gay or lesbian households fare just as well emotionally and socially as children whose parents are heterosexual. Studies have shown that children are more influenced by their interactions with their parents, than by their sexual orientation. † (Belge, 2010). â€Å"An estimated 65,500 adopted children are living with a lesbian or gay parent (in the United States). † (Craft, 2009). A long-time friend of a member of our group was raised by lesbian parents and he could not be more grateful for them. He was adopted by one of them so only one mom is considered his â€Å"legal† parent, but he and his two sisters consider both to be their moms, They their parents and love them very much, and could not imagine any other life. When a same-sex couple uses artificial insemination to give birth to a child, only one care giver is considered to be the legal guardian. If same-sex couples were able to adopt children, then both partners would be considered legal guardians and if anything were to happen to either of the parents, the other would be able to take full custody. (Belge, 2010). Currently the general way for same-sex couples to adopt is for one partner to do the adoption, and once the child is in custody of the adopted parent, the other partner applies to be a second parent or co-parent. This method is the most common because it has been granted by the courts in twenty-one states. (Craft, 2009). The National Adoption Center, whose motto is â€Å"There are no unwanted children, just unfound families† Encourage LGBT (lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender) community members to adopt. They believe that all prospective adoptive parents should be given the opportunity to raise and nurture a child. (Vogel, 2010). The National Adoption Center has also started a program encouraging LGBT members to apply for adoption. Funded by the Wachovia Foundation, the program wants to expand the amount of potential permanent families in the LGBT community and develop services for prospective families. (Vogel, 2010). If the National Adoption Center encourages same-sex couples to apply for adoption, then It is obvious that they make suitable guardians. If same-sex couples were allowed to adopt children, foster children would be placed in more loving family homes. All in all, same- sex couples are denied some 1,138 federal rights. (Friedrichs, 2010) In addition to the issue of adoption that same-sex couples face. There are numerous rights in medical emergency situations that same-sex couples do not receive. One of these rights is, the right to make decisions on the partners behalf. In this situation, because a gay man or lesbian woman’s partner is not recognized as a full spouse, the rights to make these decisions go to the next of kin. (Rights and Protections, 2010) This can result in someone with a distant relationship making life-critical decisions in a medical emergency. In addition to the ability to make decisions, same-sex couples do not have the same visitation rights either. Gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) couples do not in fact have any legal right to visitation and can therefore be denied entrance to the room. . (Friedrichs, 2010) Medical rights are not the only rights denied to same-sex couples. There are also numerous other benefits heterosexual couples enjoy that same-sex couples do not. Same-sex couples do not have the same social security rights as others. Under the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) of 1996, marriage is defined as a legal union between one man and one woman. Defense of Marriage Act, 2010) As a result of DOMA, same-sex couples are denied many federal rights because they do not meet these criteria. For example, when a married person’s spouse passes away they are entitled to the social security pension of their spouse. (McGough, 2010) A same-sex couple does not receive this benefit and the social security pension is simply terminated. United States Representative â€Å"Linda Sanchez† is proposing that the soc ial security benefits received by heterosexual married couples be extended to members of same-sex partnerships as well. McGough, 2010) This could be a substantial step in the right direction for same-sex couples around the country. With the passing of this bill, these couples could be one step closer to receiving the benefits and equality that they strive for on a daily basis. However, with the current economic position of the United States, it is unlikely that such a bill will in fact pass. This would mean more money being paid out by the United States government for Social Security, a system that is already shaky and its future uncertain. Work related benefits are also a strong dividing line between the rights that heterosexual couples receive and the rights that same-sex couples receive. The military is also a battleground for gay rights. With the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell laws passed in the nineties, openly gay, lesbian, or transgender individuals have not been able to serve in the United States Military. (Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, 2010) DADT, as it is known, states that members of the military do not disclose their sexual orientation to other members of the military. If a person is open about their sexuality they are forbidden from serving. This has sparked a lot of debate over the effectiveness of the law and its effect on the gay community and the military itself. Recent court hearings and polls regarding the subject show improvement for the gay community on the issue. In 2010, a federal judge declared that Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell was unconstitutional and that the armed services need to suspend the law immediately. However, the injunction was stayed meaning that DADT continued. Recently, a poll conducted by CNN determined that 78% of Americans support repealing DADT. This marks a huge win for LGBT members as there is now little credible defense of the law. Don’t Ask Don’t Tell supports the belief that gay people are somehow different on a human basis. Since sexuality has nothing to do with a soldier’s effectiveness in the field, the law is discriminating against gay, lesbian, and transgender people. As a result, the gay community is hurt by this rule set forth by the United States military. Not only does it prevent members of our country that want to serve in the military from serving, it also sets back gays on all fronts. If LGBT people were permitted to serve openly in the U. S. military it would be a huge step forward for the community and ultimately begin to reshape the country’s perception of what is â€Å"normal†. With this victory, LGBT people would be closer to realizing greater goals of Civil Unions and total integration with the United States public. Providing benefits to employee’s partners has long been a practice of many businesses and government institutions. Unfortunately, homosexual partners do not receive this right and are denied many of the work-related benefits that heterosexual couples take for granted. While many advocates of same-sex couple’s rights would argue that this is a basic right for workers, a large issue is the cost of implementing such a plan. In 2009 the Domestic Partnership and Obligations Act was brought to the floor. This act would provide health insurance, survivor annuities, compensation for work-related injuries, and travel and relocation for partners of same-sex federal workers. (Ballenstedt, 2010) To implement this plan for government employees alone would cost almost $900 million over the next ten years. Extending Federal Benefits, 2009) Couple this with the already high amounts of spending of the United States government and the fact that same-sex benefits are such a controversial subject and there is a lot going against this act. A sometimes unrecognized benefit of the legalization of civil unions in Arizona is the benefit to the economy. As we all know, the current economy is not as strong as it once was. Currently homosexual couples are taxed as sin gle people even if they are in a civil union. According to MSN (Microsoft Network), 58% of all couples allowed to file jointly saved an average of $1300. 0 dollars a year (Weston). GALLUP poll states, 10% of the Arizona population is gay or lesbian. This was taken with a 95% confidence interval +- 5% (Robison). If we take the low end, 5% of 6,595,778 people, times the 58% who saved money by having joint filing rights and times it by $1300. 00, it is close (30 million off) to a whopping 5 billion dollars! By doing the math, there is a huge benefit to the economy if homosexuals couples can civil union since this would put money back in the pockets of gays and lesbians who could spend this money at local retail stores. Also, the tax loss to the government would not be significant because money would still be generated through sales taxes. This new spending would create more jobs in Arizona and an overall better standard of living. This would benefit the business as well as the people filing jointly. One example is with the current economic financial crisis and the current state of the economy. The $1300. 00 dollars could be the difference between foreclosing on homes as well as being able to afford other basic needs such as food and water. There is a value added here that cannot be justified in pure numbers and that is he self-confidence this will give homosexual people. They will be able to feel that their government is taxing them fairly and not penalizing them for being gay or lesbian. It will also help support the principles to which our country was founded upon which is equal rights for all. The most important social benefit of the legalization of civil unions is that it will increase toleranc e and understanding among others especially those who are younger. It will also pave the way for gay marriage and allow a starting ground for politicians to get behind. Currently there are no laws regarding decimation against gays. As Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), only prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This means it is currently completely legal to refuse someone a job based solely on the fact that they are lesbian or gay. Having a bill like this become a law will make it easier to amend the current laws we have based on antidiscrimination. This will also add protection for homosexuals couples. It will also allow for less teasing and harassment in schools. When a law is passed that permits homosexual civil unions more lesbian and gay couples will come out of the wood work and use this option to get recognized by the great state of Arizona. This will make the public face of homosexuals more common and will make the child of two same sex parents less likely to be teased at school or anywhere else, as it would not be uncommon anymore. It would also contribute to the above point of helping the economy as it would prevent discrimination in the work place. Due to current discrimination, homosexuals are unable to get jobs based on their sexual preference which prevents them from contributing to the workforce and therefore generate spendable income. Conclusion Same-sex couples should not be denied the same rights that are afforded to traditional couples like rights that can have emotional consequences, such as being allowed visitation in a hospital or to make critical decisions in event of a medical emergency. The foster care system is currently overloaded with un-adopted children, because there aren’t enough families to adopt.

The Rabinnovich Article Titled Seven Wars And A Peace Treaty,gives A C

The Rabinnovich article titled 'Seven Wars and a Peace Treaty',gives a chronological background of wars made between Arabs and Israeli's after the birth of Israeli state. I: First War;1948-1949 The Israeli's reffered this war as the war of Independence.It had two distinct phases.It first begun in 1947 after UN resolution on the partition of Palestine.The resolution was accepted by the Jewish community,but Arabs rejected.The result was a civil war.Until May 15, 1948 th two feuding communities tried to predispose the outcome of the full-fledged strife that was bound to folow te evacuation of British forces.As a result,much of fighting was mainly over the control of roads and the mixed cities. After Israeli's declaration of independence,Egypt,Lebanon,Iraq,Syria and Jordan invaded Palestine to help Palestinian Arabs.This war lasted eight months.Israel Defence Forces (IDF) a formal army,fought with 5 arab states armies. By December 1948,it was clear that Israel had won the war.Egyptian army was advanced well into Sinai.Lebanese army was pushed back to its borders and Israelis captured part of South Lebanon.Syrian army was forced to retreat to a line corresponding,to the pre 1948 international boundary.Those zones became demilitarized.The war ended with Jordan in control of what became West Bank.Iraqi army played a minor role,ts major role was pushing the Arab League to intervene in the war. But how could Israel succeed? It enjoyed the benefit of coherent leadership,whose impact was magnified by David Ben-Gurion's ability to integrate military and politiical elements into comphrensive strategy.Israel was predicted on social and political structures of its own long before.Later in the war,it obtained arms and turneits early military disadvantages into advantages.Soviet assistance to Israel was one reflection of the international dimension of the war.By helping Israel,Moscow hoped to disturb the status quo. In the end of the war,Israel had larger area than the UN partition solution had reaffirmed.So Palestine refugee problem was created.It was humuliating for Arabs. 2. THE SINAI-SUEZ CAMPAIGN WAR;OCTOBER 1956 1950's the antiagonism of the states was expressed in the means of politic,economics and military acts.The Arab boycott,the closure of Gulf of Tiran and Suez Canal to Israel shipping can be shown as such examples. Arabs designed a full-scale war to undo the consequences of 1948-1949 war and destroy Israeli state.For Israel, it would be a limited war,just to stregethen its position and anticipate Aon an arab attack. In the mean time Egypt was growing to be a regional power under the rule of Nasser,who was a pan-Arabist leader,a friend of Soviet Union,It was the firestarter of struggles against Israel. There were waves of raids organized by Palestinian groupings from Gaza Strip and West Bank against Israel.Nasse created a tripartite military pact among Egypt,Syria and Jordan. Nationalization of Suez canal and Britain's evacuation from the place increased the influence of Egypt over Syria and Jordan.Nasser's attack on the remnants of of Britain and France's colonial empires had an important effect too.So France and Israeli alience was formed.Briatin and France wanted to save their position in the region.So In Ocober 1956,in collusion with Britain and France,Israel attacked Egypt. Iasrael believed its was waging a defensive war,Arabs were becoming belligerent.So she decided to launch the Sinai campaign,to reach Suez Canal,to destroy Egyptian Army in the Sinai and to capture Sharm el Sheikh,the point at the southern tip of the Sinai Peninsula dominating the Tiran strait.By reaching the Suez Canal,they would pave the way for the Britain and France to launch their own military operation. Although they were thwarled by USA and SU, Israel evacuated the Sinai and the Gaza Strip in 1957( later in return for security arrangements made by the Eisenhower adminitration.) Nasser turned this military defeat into political victory.Sinai was to be demilitarized and to be held by a limited Egyptian power in case of any surprise attack.Also,UN forces were to be settled in the Gaza Strip,along Sinai and Sharm el-Sheikh. This war showed Israel's impressive military capability,it contributed to the consolidation of its regional and international standing.But Nasser did not take any lessons,he started another war.He rested on the advantage of an Egyptian and arab militay build up,a sufficiant measuere of Arab cooperation to permit the formation of a single arab around Israel and Israel's international isolation. 3. THE SIX DAYS WAR;JUNE 5-10 1967 Soviet Union felt USA was trying to topple Syrian Baath Party regime and isolate

Term paper Voting right Essays

Term paper Voting right Essays Term paper Voting right Essay Term paper Voting right Essay The theme of my collage was conflict. It was about the Hungarian War of 1956. When I started to work on the collage the theme was something wanted the viewer to understand as they looked at it. I did not want to give more details about this war. I wanted the viewer to see the collage and have curiously about the subject to research It. I wanted the viewer to wonder why 1956? As I progress through making my collage I want to go over the emphasis of the number 56 in red represents my theme, the lance of the images in the collage and color. Emphasizing the number fifty-six at the center of the collage was purposely done to show the theme of the collage. The Hungarian War of 1956 was a tragic war that I wanted to inform people out by doing a collage that included some of the events that happened. In the collage under the year 1956 you can see a tank with little green color. If you look closely at the tank you see it is made of dollar bills. This was to represent the war started because Stalin was taking over all the economy of the Hungarian people, which the people had enough. They were tired of not being able to control anything so they decided to fight back the Stalin government and get their land back. The Hungarian people were poor and not had much If any of actual weapons to win this war but they still fought and In the collage on the left side the big boy represents these actions of the Hungarian people. The balance of the collage was done for it to have more power on the left side than the right side. As you look at the collage on the left it is how the Hungarian War darted by people deciding to rebel, this was when people felt strong so it is the biggest image on the collage. The Hungarian people thought that if they rebel they could win against Stalins government. They did not think about all the power Stalin had because they were tired on the control they were under and their poverty. The collage was done in chronological order from the people deciding to rebel, to the Hungarian people fighting against Stalins people and ending with defeat and destruction. There are some Images that have color while others that do not. The color was one to show the power the Hungarian people had at the beginning of the war until the end of it. There is an image of skulls that is in color. This shows that there were some dead bodies at the beginning of the war but since Stalins government had left the Hungarian people alone in 1956 for three days-the Hungarian people thought they had won and had power. As the three days pass and you progress through the collage you see the tank in the middle which basically ends the Hungarian War. The end results as you look at the images in my project are people dying and total extraction of Hungary. At the right side of the collage in the top corner you see a woman that says Walt a minute That Is not right. This woman Is representing millions of the Hungarian that died because they did not have the sources of defenses that Stalins government had. There Is a clock next to her which Just represents the little time that the Hungarian people thought they had freedom from Stalins rule and how little did the is impacted by the image and decide to figure out what it symbolizes. This collage was to inform people about the Hungarian war of 1956 but also make people work for the info. I did not want to add too much detail because it be over whelming for the viewer and also it would lose the purpose of researching what happened that year. The images I used were key concepts of the Hungarian War that would help the viewer find information of what happened. I also, tried to make the shape of the collage as a semi-not perfect crown to symbolize Stalins ruling in Hungary before and after the war. His ruling was not perfect for the Hungary people but it still was their government even after their rebel.

Congress Members Who Voted Against the 2002 Iraq War

Congress Members Who Voted Against the 2002 Iraq War The directionless Iraq War has killed over 4,100 U.S. soldiers, wounded or maimed more than 200,000 more, and delivered a devastating blow to our countrys reputation and moral authority. Its time we honor the members of Congress who voted in 2002 to prevent the Bush administrations hasty rush into an unprovoked attack and occupation of Iraq. Voter Breakdown The dramatic, much-debated vote on Joint Resolution 114 was taken on Oct. 11, 2002. It passed the Senate by a vote of 77 to 23, and the House of Representatives by a vote of 296 to 133. In the end, 156 members of Congress from 36 states had enough information and personal insight and wisdom to make the correct decision for our nation and the world community. Six House Republicans and one Independent joined 126 Democratic members of the House of Representatives in voting NAY. In the Senate, 21 Democrats, one Republic, and one Independent courageously voted their consciences in 2002 against the War in Iraq. These discerning, courageous leaders are exactly what our country needs to lead us out of the present abyss in Iraq under the Bush Administration. We can trust their judgment! Voting Record This convenient list is organized by state, and features all 156 members of Congress who voted NAY to the War in Iraq, including their political affiliations. State Congress Name Party Notes Alabama Rep Earl Hilliard D retired from office Arizona Rep Ed Pastor D Arkansas Rep Vic Snyder D California Sen Barbara Boxer D California Rep Joe Baca D California Rep Xavier Becerra D California Rep Lois Capps D California Rep Gary Condit D California Rep Susan Davis D California Rep Anna Eshoo D California Rep Sam Farr D California Rep Bob Filner D California Rep Mike Honda D California Rep Barbara Lee D California Rep Zoe Lofgren D California Rep Robert Matsui D deceased California Rep Juanita Millender-McDonald D California Rep George Miller D California Rep Grace Napolitano D California Rep Nancy Pelosi D California Rep Lucille Roybal-Allard D California Rep Loretta Sanchez D California Rep Hilda Solis D California Rep Pete Stark D California Rep Mike Thompson D California Rep Maxine Waters D California Rep Diane Watson D California Rep Lynn Woolsey D Colorado Rep Diana DeGette D Colorado Rep Mark Udall D Connecticut Rep Rosa DeLauro D Connecticut Rep John Larson D Connecticut Rep James Maloney D Florida Sen Bob Graham D Florida Rep Corrine Brown D Florida Rep Alice Hastings D Florida Rep Carrie Meek D retired from office Georgia Rep John Lewis D Georgia Rep Cynthia McKinney D Hawaii Sen Daniel Akaka D Hawaii Sen Daniel Inouye D Hawaii Rep Neil Abercrombie D Illinois Sen Dick Durbin D Illinois Sen Bobby Rush D Illinois Rep Jerry Costello D Illinois Rep Danny Davis D Illinois Rep Lane Evans D Illinois Rep Luis Gutierrez D Illinois Rep Jesse Jackson Jr. D Illinois Rep Bill Lipinski D retired from office Illinois Rep Jan Schakowsky D Indiana Rep Julia Carson D Indiana Rep John Hostettler R Indiana Rep Pete Visclosky D Iowa Rep Jim Leach R Maine Rep Tom Allen D Main Rep Baldacci D Maryland Sen Barbara Mikulski D Maryland Sen Paul Sarbanes D Maryland Rep Benjamin Cardin D Maryland Rep Elijah Cummings D Maryland Rep Connie Morella D Massachusetts Sen Ted Kennedy D Massachusetts Rep Michael Capuano D Massachusetts Rep Bill Delahunt D Massachusetts Rep Barney Frank D Massachusetts Rep Jim McGovern D Massachusetts Rep Richard Neal D Massachusetts Rep John Olver D Massachusetts Rep John Tierney D Michigan Sen Carl Levin D Michigan Sen Debbie Stabenow D Michigan Rep David Bonior D Michigan Rep John Conyers Jr. D Michigan Rep John Dingell D Michigan Rep Dale Kildee D Michigan Rep Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick D Michigan Rep Sandy Levin D Michigan Rep Lynn Rivers D Michigan Rep Bart Stupak D Minnesota Sen Mark Dayton D Minnesota Sen Paul Wellstone D deceased Minnesota Rep Betty McCollum D Minnesota Rep Jim Oberstar D Minnesota Rep Martin Olav Sabo D Mississippi Rep Bennie Thompson D Missouri Rep William Clay Jr. D MIssouri Rep Karen McCarthy D retired from office New Jersey Sen Jon Corzine D New Jersey Rep Rush Holt D New Jersey Rep Robert Menendez D New Jersey Rep Frank Pallone Jr D New Jersey Rep Donald Payne D New Mexico Sen Jeff Bingaman D New Mexico Rep Tom Udall D New York Rep Maurice Hinchey D New York Rep Amo Houghton R New York Rep John LaFalce D New York Rep Gregory Meeks D New York Rep Jerrold Nadler D New York Rep Major Owens D New York Rep Charles Rangel D New York Rep Jose Serrano D New York Rep Louise Slaughter D New York Rep Edolphus Towns D New York Rep Nydia Velazquez D North Carolina Rep Eva Clayton D retired from office North Carolina Rep David Price D North Carolina Rep Melvin Watt D North Dakota Sen Kent Conrad D Ohio Rep Sherrod Brown D Ohio Rep Stephanie Tubbs Jones D Ohio Rep Marcy Kaptur D Ohio Rep Dennis Kucinich D Ohio Rep Thomas Sawyer D Ohio Rep Ted Strickland D Oregon Sen Ron Wyden D Oregon Rep Earl Blumenauer D Oregon Rep Peter DeFazio D Oregon Rep Darlene Hooley D Oregon Rep David Wu D Pennsylvania Rep Robert Brady D Pennsylvania Rep William Coyne D retired from office Pennsylvania Rep Mike Doyle D Pennsylvania Rep Chaka Fattah D Rhode Island Sen Lincoln Chafee D Rhode Island Sen Jack Reed D Rhode Island Rep James Langevin D South Carolina Rep Gresham Barrett R South Carolina Rep James Clyburn D Tennessee Rep John Duncan Jr R Texas Rep Lloyd Doggett D Texas Rep Charles Gonzalez D Texas Rep Ruben Hinojosa D Texas Rep Sheila Jackson-Lee D Texas Rep Eddie Bernice Johnson D Texas Rep Ron Paul R Texas Rep Silvestre Reyes D Texas Rep Ciro Rodriguez D retired from office Vermont Sen Jim Jeffords D Vermont Sen Patrick Leahy D Vermont Rep Bernie Sanders I Virginia Rep Jim Moran D Virginia Rep Bobby Scott D Washington Sen Patty Murray D Washington Rep Jay Inslee D Washington Rep Rick Larsen D Washington Rep Jim McDermott D District of Columbia Rep Brian Baird D West Virginia Sen Robert Byrd D West Virginia Rep Alan Mollohan D West Virginia Rep Nick Rahall D Wisconsin Sen Russ Feingold D Wisconsin Rep Tammy Baldwin D Wisconsin Rep Jerry Kleczka D retired from office Wisconsin Rep David Obey D

Cantonese Romanization System Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Cantonese Romanization System - Research Paper Example From the essay it is clear this is a form of Romanizing Cantonese proper nouns that is widely used by the Hong Kong government departments and non-governmental organizations in Hong Kong. This use of this method by the government has a long history dating back to the days of British rule and it has undergone a lot of metamorphosis through the two world wars. There are no strict guidelines laid on the method since it just established itself and since then it became a common practice. Due to the un-standardized nature of the method, this system got its critics to a point that other systems are recommended in teaching institutions for its place. As the research declares there are several drawbacks associated with Hong Kong government Romanization system. Firstly, Hong Kong government Romanization system not fully standardized as a system and thus posses a great challenge in spelling since many of the phonemes are similar to more than one letter combination or the other way round. Secondly, In Hong Kong government Romanization system, all tones and distinctions between unaspirated and aspirated stops are omitted and this leads to a great problem in spelling. Lastly, there is existence of inconsistencies throughout Hong Kong government Romanization system as a result of loss of distinctions historically. That is, a distinction between alveolar and palatal sounds making most consonants undistinguished in present-day speech, lacks tone marks, lacks diacritics and different spellings sometimes used for the similar phonemes.

Analysis and Action Plan for a Middle School Teacher of English Essay

Analysis and Action Plan for a Middle School Teacher of English Language Learners - Essay Example In this classroom, Mr. O’Malley tends to use the natural approach and English Language Development (ELD) in Maria’s case even though it was not successfully as she could not interact with others. The ELD strategy involves the use of systematic instructional strategy that is designed to enhance English acquisition by students to whom English is not the primary language (WIDA, 2012). In this case, the learners interact with each other. Mr. O’Malley made sure that Maria’s classmates assisted her and included her in every activity. The natural language acquisition process has the student developing basic communication skills first and focusses on fluency while speaking English in a social context. The heterogeneous grouping of the natural process was through ensuring that Maria got included in every activity. In the case of Mikhail, Mr. O’Malley used the strategy of connecting learning to previous knowledge; though it was unsuccessful as he could not write a good essay without grammatical issues. The strategy comprises providing the student with new topic connections or events from the learner’s background and making them give a connection between the vocabulary in their first language and English. Mikhail had been schooling in the United for two years; thus he does not have a problem communicating in class, but his main problem is in grammatical mistakes. Therefore, linking his knowledge of English learned in the college to his first language can help improve his grammar. After and before reading, students tend to respond to prompts that assist them in linking their experiences to the main theme and characters (Curtin, 2009). The instructional inputs that follow the prompts give oral language practice for the ELLs and assist in deepening the students’ comprehension conceptual framework. Researchers discovered that the instructional input increases comprehension for the ELLs and deepens their